Comments on: Google Toolbar For Google Chrome Browser

By: JasonS

JasonS — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:27:00 +0000

In google chrome I’m unable to use several toolbars I regularly use in internet explorer. Two I would really like to see in google chrome are the google toolbar (of course) and the mcafee site advisor toolbar.

By: dozzy

dozzy — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 06:40:46 +0000

that’s EXACTLY the reason i’m writing this comment on safari

By: kk

kk — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:32:27 +0000

chrome without google toolbar??????????
i am angry….i will never use google chrome…..
you bad google !!!!!
i hate you :(

By: Shumon Raja

Shumon Raja — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:16:23 +0000

I also like the way the google chrome is much more faster,but I wonder why Google toolbar is not associated with it.

By: Anand

Anand — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:12:11 +0000

Google Chrome is Much Faster than Mozilla. I am waiting for Add ons from Chrome.

Different Theme
Page Rank Toolbar
Whether Forcast
SEO Tools (Supportive )
Twitter (Add ons)

By: Gooogle

Gooogle — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:13:16 +0000

It’s just strange! It’s like Google is trying to support Firefox and Internet Explorer because Google toolbar is not suitable for Google Chrome! I think Google is too l.a.z.y. to make the toolbar for Chrome.

By: alind

alind — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:44:19 +0000

Forget the toolbar….I want to be able to save all the tabs in one request (like in FF)…I often have new 30 tabs on one subject that I would like to come back to later. I don’t want to save each one at a time (exspecially when I am in a hurry).

By: Bravo34

Bravo34 — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:24:32 +0000

Man I guess the people have spoken….. we want our Google toolbar… Not to mention can’t use Roboform in Chrome either. Real disappointment!!! Come on Google we have come to hold you to a higher standard and we expect more out of you. Please let’s get this toolbar situation handled.

By: Zarko

Zarko — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:35:44 +0000

Hey folks, at least 75% of the Google Toolbar functionality is actually built in into Chrome – honest :-) Got to dig a bit first. I didn’t even realize it at first, like I started searching inside pages it was there, spellchecking – there, typing google search string into address bar … Only then I turned around and yelled – hey where’s that toolbar :-)))

So, yeah, I’d love to have a row of “buttons” like everyone else but don’t mind having the same functionality and just accessed in a different way. Not sure about the popup blocker – hardly ever saw any popups so can’t test it :-)

Anyway, since this is the place to complain about what do you miss :-), I mostly miss some functionality from some FireFox plugins, in particular multi-row tabs (love to keep 30-40 open :-), tab coloring and ad-site blocking with updated list (huge time and bandwidth saver). Wouldn’t mind full greasemonkey equiv, but that’s on the esoteric side.

On the matter of one process per window, it does have drawbacks, but so far Chrome has been much better in managing them compared to IE8 (which has the same system). Down the line, I’d love to see Google folks going where no man went before and using both procs and threads – wihtout crashes :-) I’ll write you a design doc if that’s going to help :-)

For the uninitiated – using both multiple threads and multiple processes for browser windows is a hairy business. IE6 was close to it, but then they chickened out in 7 and 8. FireFox is all threads single proc, so after about 50 tabs the proces becomes huge hog. One process per window is ultra-safe, as in you can ship buggy code “inside” :-) and no one will notice, but doesn’t scale up either. Doing both requires a way for user to tell if you want new window in new thread or new proc (IE6 had it, but never publicized as a feature) and essentially zero bug code (IE6 obviously didn’t have that :-). Plus one other little thing and would take to long to write about.

By: atle

atle — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:23:34 +0000

oky sorry to google i get the point now,, and now i hav all my bookmarks in chrome to ++++ tnx tnx tnx